Rajiv's Law of Complex Issue Discussion:
The amount of outrage expressed by a person on any complex issue is inversely proportional to their understanding of it.
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Friday, June 26, 2009
You must not of learned much!
Okay, I decided to post a quick note to this dormant blog about a pet peeve I have that today boiled over into active frustration. For some reason, today I saw THREE separate instances of people using "of" instead of "have." It drives me NUTS even though I realize how irrational the reaction is.
I am guessing that it is because of the SOUND of the word, people have written things like "I must of learned something in class," or "You should of come over yesterday," or "You must of stayed out late last night."
What is the deal here? Surely when you write it you realize how stupid it looks and sounds? If you can't figure out when to use "have," just go ahead and use a contraction like "must've" or "should've" even though I'm not a huge fan of that usage.
Phew! That feels better ...
And while we're at it, people PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ...
This post cannot peek your interest, but it certainly can pique your interest.
I am guessing that it is because of the SOUND of the word, people have written things like "I must of learned something in class," or "You should of come over yesterday," or "You must of stayed out late last night."
What is the deal here? Surely when you write it you realize how stupid it looks and sounds? If you can't figure out when to use "have," just go ahead and use a contraction like "must've" or "should've" even though I'm not a huge fan of that usage.
Phew! That feels better ...
And while we're at it, people PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE ...
This post cannot peek your interest, but it certainly can pique your interest.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)